Start with the end in mind, as Stephen Covey taught us. But you’re not going to get there without intentionally putting together a plan and then measuring your progress along the way to make sure you are meeting or exceeding your own expectations. The key in all of that is being intentional. You teach your clients this every day. But when it comes to your own agency, many of you don’t really have a plan or aren’t actively working the plan you have.
My podcast guest Paul Roetzer is nothing if not intentional. He created and built his agency with intention every step of the way. As a result, he now has an agency that is an industry leader when it comes to content creation, inbound marketing, performance and strategy. Paul and I cover pricing, content strategy, client fit and employee retention in this podcast. Listen in to see:
- Why Paul started PR 20/20
- How to create a modern, content-driven agency
- Standardizing pricing to prevent scope creep
- Paul’s point system for pricing
- How to create a content strategy that works today
- Top of the funnel content vs. bottom of the funnel content
- Using the point system for professional development
- Where to find the great content writers that you will need to hire
- How PR 20/20 decides if a client is a good fit
- The Marketing Score
- Automated Insights
- Steps agencies can take right now
- How to keep employees around and enthusiastic
Paul Roetzer is founder and CEO of PR 20/20, a Cleveland-based inbound marketing agency and HubSpot’s first Agency Partner. He is author of “The Marketing Performance Blueprint” (Wiley, 2014) and “The Marketing Agency Blueprint” (Wiley, 2012); creator of Marketing Agency Insider and Marketing Score; a regular contributor to leading marketing industry blogs; and a frequent speaker on content marketing, inbound marketing, performance and strategy.
To listen – you can visit the Build A Better Agency site (https://www.agencymanagementinstitute.com/paul-roetzer/) and grab either the iTunes or Stitcher files or just listen to it from the web.
If you’d rather just read the conversation, the transcript is below:
Table of Contents (Jump Straight to It!)
- Reinventing the Agency Model
- How to Create a Content-Driven Agency
- How to Decide if a Client is a Good Fit for Your Agency
- Staying Plugged in to Agency Trends
If you are going to take the risk of running an agency, shouldn’t you get the benefits too? Welcome to “Build a Better Agency,” where we show you how to build an agency that can scale and grow with better clients, invest in employees, and best of all, more money to the bottom line. Bringing his 25-plus years of expertise as both in agency owner and agency consulting to you, please welcome your host, Drew McLellan.
Drew: Hey, everybody, welcome back to another episode of Build a Better Agency. Today we are gonna talk about a topic that I know is paramount on many of your minds, and that’s the whole issue of…a couple issues actually, content marketing, creating content inside your agency, and sort of knowing when to pivot with your agency. The basic principle of today’s conversation will be how to turn your agency into a modern, content-driven agency.
So today’s guest is not gonna be a stranger to any of you, I suspect. Paul Roetzer is the founder and CEO of PR 20/20, a Cleveland-based inbound marketing agency and HubSpot’s first agency partner. He’s written two really awesome books. In 2012, he wrote “The Marketing Agency Blueprint” which, if you have known me at any point in time, you have seen me recommend in workshops and conversations I’ve had with agency owners. He also just recently in 2014 came out with “The Marketing Performance Blueprint,” which is the perfect companion to his first book.
He also has created “The Marketing Agency Insider,” which has lots of great content for agency owners and leaders, and “Marketing Score.” He is a regular contributor to leading marketing industry blogs, a frequent speaker on content marketing, inbound marketing, performance and strategy. Paul, welcome to the podcast.
Paul: Thanks so much for having me.
Reinventing the Agency Model
Drew: So you have done what a lot of agencies really wrestle with, is you have sort of reinvented yourself a couple times. So take us back to before your agency was doing inbound. Were you a traditional ad agency as we think of it?
Paul: Yeah, the origin…the quick origin story for anybody who hasn’t heard of our background is I started a traditional agency, mostly PR, some crisis communication, strategic planning, brand marketing. So I came right out of college into that agency. It was a small shop, about six people, and I spent about five and half years there and the last year and a half I was there, I started really asking a lot of questions about why the business model worked the way it did. Why we used billable hours? How come we didn’t report on actual performance metrics? All of these things that I came to learn, that’s kind of how the agency world had been built.
So, I started nights and weekends trying to build a different approach to it. What I ended up creating was PR 20/20, which the premise of it was standardized services and set pricing and it was 19 service categories that were all very traditional in term of their scope, so it was like PR and advertising and direct mail and events. So I started that November of ’05. I left the small firm I was at and started my own. And then it was in Fall of 2007 when I learned about HubSpot and we contacted them, ended up signing up as a customer and then I pretty quickly realized the potential that existed in inbound, which at that time was really like SEO and social and email and analytics and all the things that traditional agencies weren’t really doing.
And so in early 2008, we started bundling, taking that standardized services set pricing model and applying it to specific services that HubSpot customers needed. And so we built service packages with set fees that were designed for people that were using HubSpot software and that became the origin of HubSpot’s partner program today.
Drew: So when you were reinventing the agency model and you were coming up with this list of 19 or 20 standardized services…one of the things I hear agency owners talk about all the time is the struggle to standardize pricing because every project is different. So how did you wrestle that one to the ground?
Paul: So that was before I started the business, before I actually left and did my own thing, I spent…I think at one point I calculated about 600 hours creating the standard service guide and it had 19 categories, 105 services and then 3 pricing levels for each service, so it was this monster spreadsheet. And my theory was if I could standardize the scope, then I could standardize the price. So for example, if I’m gonna do a sell sheet…one original copy, three rounds of revisions, and includes one interview…like, I would just build out the scope of each thing and so that became the foundation of everything we’ve done for 10 and a half years. Take a project, take a service, if you can standardize the scope, you can apply a standard price to it. And it started in the early days as…we used just a fixed fee and then we kind of evolved into like word count and we would still use hour blocks and now today we’re on a point pricing model.
Drew: So where did that fall down? Or did it? Again, I can hear agency owners in my head going, “Well, no one ever had” or “only wants one,” or, “They ought to have more than three revisions,” how did you handle all of the client-centric realities around that?
Paul: Yeah, it’s a huge challenge and it’s probably still something we deal a little bit with today. But scope creep is a massive problem for agencies.
Paul: Yeah, and it’s exactly what you are saying. Like, web is a huge process … like, you get one version of the home page and two versions of the interior page and the next thing you know, you’re doing seven interior pages.
So for us, because we were so transparent in how the pricing worked and what exactly you were getting, then when it exceeded that, it was a pretty easy conversation to have. And what we found was though even when we had these fixed costs to it, so like $500 for a logo design, you would still get outside the scope. And the biggest problem became, because a lot of our services still had hours related to what we were charging and that was the origin of the points. You get x amount of points and whatever gets done within those points, then that’s fine. If you want anything other than this, then we add to it.
So again, it’s this, for 10+ years, it’s been all about total transparency into what we charge and what they get. Because we are so transparent, we can have conversations when scope creep comes into play a lot more easily because the client, there is no mystery to what we’re doing. I think the problem a lot of firms run into with scope creep is to back to the client and say, well we need another 3 hours to do that. The client is going to look back at me and say, “Why didn’t you work more efficiently and then you wouldn’t need the 3 more hours? I just want the output. I just want what I thought I was going to get and this isn’t it yet.” So, that’s the problem. Hours are so variable in terms of the value you get out of them, that it’s largely based on the person who is doing the work. So the producer efficiency has a huge effect on the value you get.
Drew: So, tell the listeners a little bit about your points-based system.
Paul: So the concept, and this is something I’ve been working on for years, so the first book you mentioned, “The Marketing Agency Blueprint,” the first chapter is Eliminate Billable Hours. So it’s no secret that I don’t, that I think that there’s a better way to do pricing. The challenge was, when I wrote the first book, I didn’t have a better way. We were just…a lot of the first book was what I thought was theoretically possible and so we focused on value based pricing and we gave seven factors to consider when determining your value pricing, but we did not present a “Here is how you should price your services” model.
So it was after the book came out that I was really, really fixated on trying to find a more profitable solution for us that was also more value based for the client. We do a lot of work in B2B tech and so we spend a lot of time around software developers and I was at the time studying a lot around Agile development and I loved the idea of story points, but I thought story points were kind of abstract. But I liked this idea of a fixed unit of value. It’s not a dollar because a dollar feels like an expense. When you tell someone it’s $50, it’s like, “Okay, I have to spend $50. This goes into the expense column.” But when you change the perception mentally of a point, a point feels like an incremental progress towards something. And so if we focus on, “Okay, you get 50 points for your $5000,” whatever the numbers are, then they think more about those points going towards a goal. And the points…so what we do is every project has a point value.
And so if you take a lead generation campaign and there’s an ebook, a landing page, a three-part email workflow, a Google AdWords program, each of those has a point value and so then the client looks and says, “Okay, so I’m getting these 7 things for 40 points, great,” and then they come to you and say, “Hey, can we do a sell sheet edition, too, for our sales team?” “Yeah, great. That’s another five points.” “Okay, cool.” Like, it’s all about the perception of value to them and as each of those campaigns you’re running has a goal associated with it, then those points truly are leading you towards achievement of a goal and you no longer think about what you’re doing as an expense.
Drew: And for you is a point a fixed value, so it’s not like a point for one…because at some point in time, you still have to figure out what your agency costs are to deliver a point of work, right?
Paul: Correct. Internally we still track every minute we spend on things, but my theory has always been the client shouldn’t pay for the agencies inefficiencies. So, we go in knowing what we think we should make per hour, so we still have a target hourly revenue…hourly revenue target, and we have a value of what we think we should make on every point. But the client…let’s say we write five blog posts for five different clients and there’s a different professional writing each of them. The client’s gonna get charged three points in every single instance. One client may have an associate consultant who takes seven hours to write the first draft. Another one may have a senior consultant who writes it in one hour. At the end of the day, the client’s still got the blog post that they wanted and the quality is exactly the same once it leaves the agency’s walls.
But why should one client pay $1000 and one client pay $200 for the same end product? So what the point value does is it fixes that point value for a blog post. So we have a standard guide and every blog post for every client that’s under 600 words is 3 points. Doesn’t matter how long it takes. And so our job is to figure out, how can we be efficient? Now if over time, data tells us that that three points is not enough, that we’re not hitting our hourly revenue target, then we change the point value. We increase it so it goes to a five or whatever it may be. So we use data to inform evolution of the point values, but they are standardized across clients.
Drew: And a point is worth a set dollar amount regardless of who the client is, right? So I’m gonna buy a bucket of points from you every quarter or month or however that works, is that the way you do it with clients?
Paul: Yeah, right now it’s set up where it’s tiered, so a client spending $3000 a month pays, I don’t know, $160 a point, where a client spending $8000 or $13,000 a month may pay $140 or $150 a point. In part of the iteration of the point models, we’re probably gonna flatten that. Like, it may go to where everyone pays $150, but if you look at our pricing page, it’s structured like a SaaS model, where the clients spending more money get more value adds as part of it.
Drew: And what would make you change that model? Why are you considering an evolution of that?
Paul: Because we started it in January of 2014. We started evolving and putting new clients on it AND then we eventually rolled it out to every client in our portfolio. So by the end of 2015, I think every single client in the agency was on the point model. And so now we have two years of data and then like anything else, you look at it and you learn. So my biggest thing is the…it’s hard because again, if you take a blog post and you say everyone pays three points, well, if you’re a small business and you have 1000 visitors a month to your website and you write a blog post, no one’s gonna read it, no one’s gonna find it. The value is, like, it’s a long-term value. You need to do it. Whereas if you have a client who has 100,000 visitors a month to their site and 50,000 subscribers to their blog, every blog post is a chance to move the needle. So the value to the client is actually based on their existing reach in some cases. So there’s all these variables that I knew when we built it, but I needed to see the data to help evolve it. But the main reason for the flattening is right now the way it’s structured is the clients with the least amount of money…and usually the least amount of existing traffic and reach…pay the most per point. So they get the least value out of each point, whereas the clients who have tons of traffic and reach, who get the most value for each project we do, they pay the least. So it’s rewarding people who spend more money, but in some ways, it’s penalizing the people who don’t have the money to spend, if that make sense.
Drew: Yeah. No, it does.
Paul: So that’s something I want to change.
Drew: So does your model, is there a cap on the client size? Or is there a certain kind of client that it does and doesn’t work for? Have you found over the course of the last few years, this is a great model for clients between this budget and this budget, but boy, if they’re over X, they don’t like this model? Or have you found it sort of a one size fits all for everybody?
Paul: Yeah, I’ve yet to find anyone who doesn’t like it. More often we find people who love it because of the transparency and the simplicity. What I’ll say is when you get into enterprises…so in my world that’d be billion dollar-plus companies that have far more politics internally, far more procedures…to tell them you’re not gonna charge them an hourly rate and you’re gonna use points, there’s an education process that needs to occur to calm them down and make them understand it’s actually for the best. Because everything in those organizations is so structured and has to go through procurement and so when you try and explain your point system instead of hours, it’s like, “Well, wait a second, that doesn’t make any sense. That’s not how we do it.” So that’s the only challenge, but we’ve broken through that barrier without any problems over time. But that was the only issue I originally saw was, even though hours everyone seems to understand are inefficient for the client and usually not the greatest value, it’s just what they’re used to paying. So anything different is, it’s like that first hesitation, then they kind of realize the value of it.
Drew: So for you, your agency has changed dramatically over the last 8, 9, 10 years. One of the challenges I think for a lot of agencies…I think most agencies recognize that creating content, whatever that looks like for their clientele and for the deliverables and the industries they serve, creating content is now part of agency life, but a lot of agencies haven’t cracked the code on how to do that efficiently or well. So how did you learn? You went from a very traditional agency doing I’m sure custom everything and now you’re creating a ton of content. How did you build that machine?
Paul: Yeah, it’s funny because we’re in the process now of evolving our own editorial strategy on the kind of content we produce. Because when we started doing this in 2007, 2008, if you rewind, the iPhone didn’t exist yet. So mobile, like people reading things on mobile devices wasn’t a huge thing. Facebook had only been publicly available for about a year and a half to people outside of college campuses. Twitter was just being created. The strategies…and once again, we’re only talking about eight, nine years ago…
Drew: Yeah, it’s like the wild, wild West.
Paul: Yeah, and so just having a blog differentiated you back then. And now if you think about the agency market, it’s like, “What are we gonna write about? Like, there’s only so many topics we can all write about and we’re all writing off these same things.” And so I think in the early days for us, it was just write about the trends and what’s happening and write about some thought leadership things for us, but we weren’t really tying it to our sales process. We weren’t thinking about bottom of the funnel when we were writing stuff. It was just all top of the funnel stuff. Get people to the site and if your pages are going up and your subscriber count was going up, great. And I think in the last three to five years, there’s been a little bit more focus.
Now a lot of these agencies have caught on and everybody has a blog of some sort now. I think there just needs to be a more strategic focus to the kind of content you do talk about. And that’s where some organizations, some agencies that go with these vertical market focuses, it can be great for them because they can write about specific areas, specific industries that other agencies aren’t really writing about. They can take those broader lessons and best practices and apply them to a specific type of organization.
In our case, we’re starting to think more about bottom of the funnel. Like, when I have a sales call, someone reaches out to us, and I think through what are the challenges they’re going through? What are the technology issues they’re having? What are the issues they’re having with their talent? Why aren’t they meeting their performance goals? And focusing our content more around that person versus the wider net you may cast for top of the funnel content. Like, HubSpot’s a great example. They do tons of just that top of the funnel, just get people in, and then they allow their nurturing machine to really do its thing and bring people through the funnel.
Most agencies don’t have the time to pump out that kind of content. You know, you’re lucky to get one or two posts a week up. So for us, it was, you know, in the early days, it was me and couple of the other people and then over time, I just shifted the responsibility. So we now have, one of our senior consultants, one of the ladies here is also now our director of marketing and she has another consultant that works closely with her on the editorial strategy for the blog, the publishing, creating the editorial calendar, editing the content created by employees.
But the bigger thing we do is within people’s performance reviews every year. When they do an annual review, there’s three main things they are graded on and we have, everything’s quantified. There’s literally ratings for these. So there’s their client services performance, which is made up of their producer and manager skills and traits, like these three areas. But then we give them and we require them to meet thresholds or points for marketing and for professional development. And for marketing, it’s how many blog posts did you write for the agency blog? And so we have an expectation at each level of how many they should write and their annual performance is in part, now the weighting is about 5% today, but about 5% of the total performance rating they get for the year is how well they contributed to the agency marketing.
Drew: So inside of that, what kind of ongoing education are you doing internally so that they have the fodder, if you will, to create that kind of content that serves your prospects and your clients?
Paul: It’s a mix. We actually…so Tracy Lewis, if you’ve dealt with before for our Marketing Agency Insider site, she’s our director of talent and she actually guides the ProDev system internally. And so employees have different requirements. So, we actually use the point system for professional development as well. So like for example, if you read a book and write a review, you get eight points. If you attend a conference, it’s eight points. If you do a book club, it’s three points. Whatever it is, there’s point values associated with each of these things and associate consultants, for example, have to meet 120 points a year and so we track that. We’ve actually built in Google Sheets, we built a dashboard that keeps track of how many professional development points employees have done. And we require specific things like Google Analytics certification and inbound marketing certification and so we put them through these learnings and then the other thing we do is we’ve gotten very good in the last year at client services workshops.
So once a month, we have these morning huddles and at the end of…it’s like the third Wednesday of every month…we spend about 45 minutes on a client workshop and usually we’ll have three different account managers present a campaign that they ran recently. So it’s like, “Here’s what we did, here’s why it mattered, here’s how it worked, here’s the challenges we ran into, here’s the performance details.” So we’re huge on knowledge-sharing and really trying to develop and then the director of marketing and her support person working closely with the team to try and guide them on topics that could be very valuable for the blog.
Drew: Yeah, it sounds like you’re incredibly intentional about it, which I think a lot of agencies struggle with.
Paul: Yeah, and it’s really like every agency knows this. We just all can’t do it. It’s what you teach the client. Like, you would never tell the client just have a blog and don’t have an editorial strategy or a content calendar. And you would never let them, when you know you’re there as an agency to help them sell more product or service, you would never guide them to just write about top of the funnel stuff. You would teach them like, “Okay, we have to talk to your sales team and find out the biggest questions they get and the challenges they hear from their prospects and let’s create content around that stuff.” Like, it’s what we know to teach people but most agencies just don’t do it.
Drew: Well, quite honestly I think it’s a lot harder work and so it’s easy to do the lazy, top of the funnel stuff.
Paul: No doubt.
Drew: Yeah, and in an environment where you’re rewarded for taking care of clients but you’re not necessarily held accountable. And by the way, oftentimes it’s the owner is not being held accountable for doing their fair share of it, of doing the agency marketing. That’s the thing that often gets kind of shoved off to the side or you do it at the last minute, which again leads you to the lazy solution, I think.
Paul: Oh, yeah, if I’m not writing a book, I don’t even know how many blog posts I’ve written in the last year for our agency blog, but my guess is it’s less than five. Like, I just don’t have time to write unless I’m like, “Okay, the next three months, all I’m doing is writing,” and then I lock myself in an office and I write for three months. But other than that, yeah, I’m with it. I get it. It’s hard.
Drew: Yeah, it’s really hard. So, I’m gonna take a quick break here and then I want to talk about how you create content for clients and helping them turn their agencies into content-driven agencies because that’s a challenge for a lot of agencies as well, but first let’s take a quick pause…
How to Create a Content-Driven Agency
Okay, we’re back with Paul and I want to dig right into, so many agencies really struggle with content creation. They struggle with doing it profitably, they struggle with doing it well. What are some best practices that you have discovered and implemented inside your shop to create as much content as you guys create for clients?
Paul: That’s a tricky one and unfortunately there’s no, no pun intended, there’s no blueprint really to doing this for every agency. So for us right now, 99% of the content we create for clients is done in-house. So it’s our writers. It’s the people running the accounts, they’re also the ones writing and we don’t use marketplaces. We rarely have used freelancers, although we’ve looked more at that recently.
So for us in that model, keeping in mind the goal is internal writing and make it as efficient, as profitable as possible, first and foremost comes down to hiring and training. So we hire largely out of journalism schools. We hire people who have some diversified backgrounds in terms of marketing and other areas but for the most part, they are writers by trade. Because my experience has been you hire a good writer and make them a great writer. You cannot, at the age of 21, make an average writer a great writer. If they aren’t at least a good writer by the time they’re out of college, you don’t have the resources to make them one. It’s too hard to train that at that point.
So our goal is to hire great writers and then the goal is to hone that and teach them how to write with marketing and storytelling in mind. Take these good technical writers, because in my opinion there’s writing, there’s creative and there’s technical. Most people come out of journalism school technical writers and they’ve often forgotten how to be creative and we need to help blend those two back together.
Drew: Yeah, their emphasis on been on the other side for so long.
Paul: Yeah, it’s AP. It’s like just news style writing and it’s checking sources and we need them to be storytellers while being technically sound. So that’s one and then the other is that intentionality, like you said earlier. It’s having professional development tracks internally to do it and then we do use tools like Grammarly, where we’re actually trying to become more efficient in our writing and editing by using new technologies that can help you do that.
Drew: And so your writers, are they pure writers or are they…back in the day back, back when I was, early in my career, I was a copy contact guy, so I wrote but I was also in essence the account manager. So how do you do that inside your shop?
Paul: We do not have any pure copywriters. So anyone who’s writing copy is also associate consultant, consultant or senior consultant, and so they are account managers. They’re the strategist, they’re dealing day-to-day with clients, and they’re also writing and editing the content. So, we don’t break off like a lot of agencies do where you have a project manager, a copywriter, a designer, whatever other buckets there may be. We actually train, like I talk about in the first book, these hybrids, it’s truly what we do. Like, we teach people to do all aspects of it and then that’s what they do on a daily basis.
Drew: So other than looking for journalists or people with a journalist background or education, are there other things in the interview process that you look for that seems to be proving that they are your more successful, productive employees?
Paul: So we have a professional scorecard, for lack of a better term, and every profession’s rated on, there’s…what we break into three categories. There’s producer skills and within that, there’s 11 skills. So like, there’s a strong copywriter, strong communicator, and they’re deeper than that, but these 11 things that make…tell us you’re gonna be a really strong producer of content. And there’s manager skills, which is same thing. It kind of assesses different skills that are required. And then there’s 11 traits: detailed, focused, things like that. And so those collectively make up what we believe to be A players. So we actually then rate a one to five scale and we have the team rate each other, kind of like 360 kind of rating. So, those sorts of ratings, we bring to the interview process. We have 11 factors we rate every interview at. So when we interview someone, we rate them across 11 factors, in essence at that point trying to project out how well they would do and how they would rate across the different areas that are really important to us.
Drew: You’re based in Cleveland. Are all your employees under your roof or do you have virtual employees?
Paul: Everybody’s in Cleveland. We last year introduced a work-from-home variation or a work remotely variation where people can work one or two days a week remotely if they choose. Because, as you know, if you’re gonna write, some people can’t write sitting in an office staring at a wall. They write better sitting in a coffee shop. So my opinion is, go sit in a coffee shop. Wherever you’re gonna be most productive and think best…like I think best on an airplane. So I don’t travel once a week just to think on a plane, but I know I have to get out of my regular environment and away from my two screens if I want to really think. So, we don’t have remote employees per se, like full-time remote, but we do let people work remotely, but they all are based out of Cleveland.
Drew: So I think one of the gifts that you have and one of the reasons why your agency is successful is because you’ve always been able to look a little far into the future and see what’s coming next. So how do you stay plugged in to the trends that are impacting agency life and client life and help you decide how and when to pivot your shop?
Paul: That’s a really good question. Appropriately timed, oddly enough, I don’t know. I read a lot of non-marketing books honestly, so part of the reason we evolved into the pricing service model we have is because I read books like “How Dell Does It” early in the development of the agency. And so I just looked at the efficiencies of the way Dell produced computers and my mind immediately thinks like, “Well, why can’t we apply that kind of thinking to services? How do you achieve economies of scale in the delivery of services?” It’s probably I’ve just always had an interest in business, not as specific in agency business, but great businesses and how they’re run and how they think about efficiency and profitability and culture. And so I just naturally kind of take those things in and then…like right now I’m really big on artificial intelligence and the impact it’s going to have on the agency world and broader picture, on marketing and on the business world. And that largely came from a book I read in 2012 called “Automate This,” and my mind hasn’t stopped since, like processing the ways that everything we do is going to be disrupted in the next decade. So, I spend some time just researching it and every once in a while write about it. And I think that’s it, is my interests are far more than just running an agency but everything I read, I’m always trying to connect the dots back to what does it mean to us, what are the opportunities it presents?
How to Decide if a Client is a Good Fit for Your Agency
Drew: So when you pitch for business…well, let’s back up. So talk to me a little bit about new business process. Obviously you’re an inbound agency and I would guess a lot of your leads come to you. How do you screen a client to decide if they’re a good fit for your model?
Paul: Yeah, in 10 and a half years, we’ve never gone looking for a piece of business. So we are truly an inbound agency in every sense of the word. It’s always been referrals or inbound leads through the website. And our process is…I actually lead that process now. I had given it up about four years ago. I’ve had couple of different people internally run it. We’ve never had a dedicated salesperson. It’s always been a consultant or a senior consultant who was running accounts and doing 100 hours client work, was moonlighting as the biz dev person and taking those inbound calls.
So last August or September, I re-assumed the lead role on it and what happens is if someone comes in, we use HubSpot so I’ll check out their behaviors. I’ll look at what pages on the site they were on and past history and kind of get a gauge of who they are and how interested they really are in us. From there, I’ll send out an email just to schedule a 15, 20-minute discovery call and then we’ll have an initial call. If it’s seem like it’s worthwhile to continue the conversation, I’m, one, I’m very direct with people I don’t think are a fit. Just so we don’t waste either their time or ours. So, there are definitely some cases and probably 50% or more where I’ll tell the person, “I don’t think we’re the right agency for you.”
But if it’s a potential fit, then we send them to Marketing Score, which is the online assessment tool you mentioned earlier. So that’s a free tool we built and launched in 2012 and we’ve had about 3000 companies use that, so we have all kinds of fascinating data on how organizations rate themselves. But for us, it was actually designed to make our business development process more scientific, to where I can predict out whether or not we can help somebody. So it looks at the strength of their foundations, assesses the probabilities of our ability to increase their performance and lead sorts of diversification. From there, it takes them about 15 minutes, it takes us about 30 minutes to build a brief based on that data, so what they’ve told us.
We’ll usually then schedule a briefing call where we’ll spend 30 to 45 minutes going through their Marketing Score report and providing some initial recommendations of things we think they could do. At that point, I know for sure whether we can help them or not and if we can’t, I will tell them at that point, you know, “Here’s some recommendations, here’s some things I would advise, but we’re not the right firm to do this for you.” If I think they’re a fit for us, we would then develop a marketing audit that’s usually about 25 to 30 questions. We’d ask for access to Google Analytics and whatever automation or analytics programs they have where we’d dive a little deeper into what’s going on and looking at the potential and that process will usually take one to three hours and then we’ll build a proposal if we think we can do it. And so all said and done, most clients will sign on between $8000 and $15,000 a month and we usually spend 7 to 10 hours in the entire process.
Drew: Yeah, I know a lot of agencies who would kill for that.
Paul: It’s gotten pretty honed over time and it’s a really efficient process for us.
Drew: So what are some of the, as you’re going through this early evaluation, what are some of the red flags or things that you look for that would suggest that these people would not be a great fit for you?
Paul: Unrealistic expectations and financial instability. Those are like the two that immediately come top of mind for me. So unrealistic expectations, what I mean by that is, we’ll ask them what their goals are. And in the initial discovery call, say like, what is your business goal? “Oh, we wanna grow 40%. We need to get 500 more leads a quarter into the funnel and if our conversion rate stays the same, it’s like, okay cool.”
So when we look then at the marketing score report, what we’re looking at is how did they rate their website traffic – and it’s all on a zero to 10 scale. How did they rate website traffic, their social reach and the size of their existing database? And if all of those are like one, two, three, what we would consider liabilities … then we have immediate red flags. Okay, you have these huge growth goals but you’re telling us that your traffic, reach and databases are weak and you only wanna spend $5,000 a month and when we look at your marketing team ratings, you rated your team at a 20%. Like you don’t have copywriters on staff.
You don’t have anybody that can do paid media management. Are you expecting us to do that for $5,000 a month? So, what we are looking for is an alignment of expectations and potential and then to insure that they are actually going to put the resources needed to make sure. Because everyone wants to grow more than 20% but no one wants to spend more than 5% of revenue.
Drew: Isn’t that a crazy coincidence?
Drew: So tell the listeners a little more about marketing score.
Paul: So, it’s themarketingscore.com. So, when I built the agency, the first thing I did was, besides the service and pricing guide, was I used SurveyMonkey to create… it was like 50 or 60 questions, it was insane… this questionnaire that would be used in business development. And so we actually used that for the first seven years, variations of it. And so what I finally said was, what if we took that and turned it into an online tool? And we put ratings to it? I actually used net promoter score as a model in my mind. I want the simplicity of, just this single rating.
So, Marketing Score kind of came out of that, that single datapoint. And so, when you take it, you actually get it, your marketing score is 41%. And then it gives you a section by section score. There are 10 sections. And there are things like business cores, marketing cores, lead sources, marketing tech utilization, marketing team strength. So it’s trying to look at all the different areas that can affect the performance of an organization and it rates them from zero to 10. And so, what happens now, when you used to do SurveyMonkey, you would finish it after 30-40 minutes and you would get a thank you page. And maybe we would use some of the information in a proposal. Maybe we wouldn’t. So you may never even see the outputs from your survey.
With Marketing Score, you get an immediate visualization of how you rated your organization. It actually takes you to a report page and it shows you pie charts and graphs and how you rate at each area and you can download a PDF. And there’s actually…it’s not publicly talked about on the site yet, but there’s a beta tool where you can invite other people in your company to also rate the company and we can then combine them into a company portal and you can aggregate the scores and look at how different people in the company rated the different areas of the company.
So like I said, it’s a free tool that just meant to help and there is actually an agency partner program which is pretty much, if you want to send people through this, go ahead. Just fill out this Google form and let us know and we won’t market to them. So it’s a free tool that has an agency component. There’s no cost for agencies and we do about 150 to 200 agencies that have used it to do assessments of their clients and prospects.
Drew: Yeah, I’ll bet. It’s a great tool and it’s a great insight to open the conversation and be able to very clearly say to a client, goals in one hand, budget in another, “Do you see how those two don’t balance?”
Paul: Yeah, and to the question you asked earlier, one of the reasons we can do the biz dev so successfully and so efficiently is all we then do is go to them and say, “Listen, I know you just wanted a lead gen strategy and us to activate HubSpot license for you, but your ratings showed us you don’t have buyer personas. You have no social reach. Your website was rated at a two. You don’t have this, this, and this. You can’t just spend the five a month. You have to put 50 upfront to fix this foundation.” And they’ll look at, like, nobody wants to spend the 50, but they’re not gonna argue with their own ratings. So all we’re doing is showing you, like, “You said these suck. All we’re doing is telling you what it’s gonna cost to fix it.”
Drew: Yeah, and, “We agree with you, they do suck. And here’s how we can fix it.”
Drew: Yeah, yeah.
Paul: “We’re glad you realize they suck and…”
Drew: Yeah, it’s a great psychology in terms of getting them to identify their own problems, rather than you telling them what’s broken and then how much it’s gonna cost to fix it.
Paul: And they think you’re just trying to sell them something.
Staying Plugged in to Agency Trends
Drew: Right. So as you are reading all these diverse books and you are looking across the landscape, beyond the robotics which you mentioned, what are other things that are on your radar screen that you think are gonna disrupt agencies over the next few years?
Paul: So artificial intelligence is where the vast majority of my focus is right now. It touches so many areas. For example, one of the areas agencies really struggle with is analytics. It’s getting the employees to understand what the data means and draw insights from it and then turn that into actions or strategies for the client. So, we use a tool called Automated Insights. It is an artificial intelligence tool that connects to Google Analytics and it actually creates complete human narrative around what’s happening on the site and to a degree what it means. To give some perspective, the Associated Press used to do 300 earnings reports a quarter. Publicly traded companies release their data, financial data. the Associated Press had humans write earnings reports, saying here’s what happened. They now are 100% written by machines.
So the Associated Press writes 3000 earnings reports a quarter now instead of 300, with zero human interaction. So basically, if you think about what can be disrupted, you can start with analytics, but now you can extrapolate that out to content marketing as a whole. So the talk I’m giving at Content Marketing World this year is called Content Marketing in the Machine Age. And so what it’s looking at is…and I’ve said this on stage before, so this isn’t a new but, “If the story is based on data, a machine can tell it faster and better than a human every time already. And the AI technology isn’t even that advanced yet.” So if you think about fantasy sports, if you watch a baseball game tonight and three minutes later, there’s a 400-word story about what happened in that game, there’s a pretty good chance a machine wrote that story and the reason it’s up so fast is because it was written in three seconds by a machine.
So that’s a massive disruption on its own and some of the tech that is out there now that’s getting massive amounts of venture capital funding, I would consider elementary artificial intelligence. It is…like Facebook and Google are way, way, way farther along than anyone could fathom with artificial intelligence. An example for people is you upload a photo to Facebook, how do they know who the 10 other people in that photo are instantaneously and recommend who to tag? Well, they’re using deep learning, they’re using advance forms of artificial intelligence that use facial recognition to know that stuff. And so if you just look at what’s going on within these innovators and you start thinking about what’ll happen when that technology becomes somewhat commoditized and available at large, the implications to agencies are massive.
Drew: Yeah, it’s a fascinating and interesting and frightening and exciting kind of time to be in the business, yeah. Absolutely. So I have enough questions that we could talk for another couple hours but I want to be respectful of your time and I know the listeners probably are about to get off the treadmill, so I want to sort of wrap this up. But if the listeners have been focusing on the things you’ve been saying and they are still a more traditional model and they need to evolve, they’re struggling with creating content…so the demand is there, but they’re struggling with doing it and for a lot of them, they’re doing this hodgepodge of traditional copywriters are doing it, they’re hiring out to outsourced resources and they really don’t have a program or a platform in place to really build out content for their clients that move the needle, that are tied to ROI, think back to when you started to make the evolution, what are some baby steps they can take to get themselves pointed in the right direction?